The purpose of this post is to show an application of differentiation technique discussed in the post Multiplicity Loci to Seshadri constants. We mainly follow the paper (Cascini and Nakamaye 2014).
Base loci
Let be a smooth projective variety of dimension and be an effective -divisor on . We denote by the stable base locus of , that is the intersection of the base loci of the linear systems for all natural numbers .
The augmented base locus of , is defined as where is an ample divisor such that is a -divisor.
Suppose that is a big divisor and is a subvariety of . The asymptotic vanishing order is defined by where is a general element in for any sufficiently large and divisible .
For the subvariety , we define the restricted volume of along to be where and .
Restricted volumes have the following properties.
Theorem 1 Let be a smooth projective variety and be a subscheme.
- if is not contained in .
- is numerical invariant.
- for sufficiently large and divisible, and for any general elements in , we have where .
- Let be a proper and birational morphism and be an irreducible subvariety on such that . Then
Lemma 1 Let be the blow-up at a point with the exceptional divisor . Given a -divisor and a positive rational number , we have where .
Let be a smooth projective variety, be a very general point, and be an effective integral divisor on . Let be the blow-up at the point with the exceptional divisor . For a subvariety , we denote by the birational transform of . Given a -divisor and a positive rational number , we set and
When estimating the restricted volume , a central technique is differentiation.
Lemma 2 ((Nakamaye 2005, Lemma 1.3)) Let be a smooth projective variety of dimension , an irreducible subvariety, and an integral ample divisor. Assume that the sheaf of differential operators of order is generated by its sections for a rational number , and sufficiently large integers and such that is a positive integer. Let be a rational number in the interval such that with . Then for any we have
In particular, if is nef, then the inequality Equation 1 holds true.
Proof. Let be any sufficiently small positive rational number. Then is ample. We may replace by as the conclusion for can be obtained by taking the limit in . Set . We may assume that is sufficiently large and sufficiently divisible so that , and are both integers. Note that a section defines a morphism By the assumption that the sheaf of differential operators of order is generated by its sections, we have a morphism of global sections We call the sections in the image of the morphism differential sections of order . Then for any differential operator . Therefore, for any , the differential section is also in and hence Assume that is a general section and is a general point such that . It can be checked that there exists a differential operator of order such that . By upper semi continuity, we see that . Therefore, The completes the proof for the first part of the assertion.
Since is nef and hence is ample for any positive number , by Lemma 2.5 in (Ein, Lazarsfeld, and Nakamaye 1996), the sheaf of differential operators of order is generated by its sections. The proof is then completed.
Upper bounds for restricted volumes
Let be an ample integral divisor on and be the blow-up of at with the exceptional divisor . The Seshadri constant of at is defined by
A subvariety is Seshadri exceptional if it is the largest dimensional subvariety such that .
When is an Seshadri exceptional curve, we have .
For any , we know that is empty.
So . Assume that . Then there exists a number such that . Consequently, . Therefore, .
We define
It’s a non-trivial fact that (see (Nakamaye 2000)).
An application of Lemma 2 and Seshadri constants is the following theorem on abelian threefold which was first proved by Lozovanu (Lozovanu 2018) using Newton-Okounkov bodies. We follow the argument in (Cascini and Nakamaye 2014).
Theorem 2 Let be a abelian threefold and be am ample divisor on . Let be a curve with . Assume that . Then
Proof. If is not in , then the theorem follows from the proof of Proposition 3.2 in (Cascini and Nakamaye 2014) and Lemma @ref(lem:Nakamaye-generalization).
Suppose that is contained in . In , taking away from a curve whose degree is at least , we find that
Note that reaches it maximum when . The theorem then follows.
References
Cascini, Paolo, and Michael Nakamaye. 2014.
“Seshadri Constants on Smooth Threefolds.” Adv. Geom. 14 (1): 59–79.
https://doi.org/10.1515/advgeom-2013-0012.
Ein, Lawrence, Robert Lazarsfeld, and Michael Nakamaye. 1996. “Zero-Estimates, Intersection Theory, and a Theorem of Demailly.” In Higher Dimensional Complex Varieties. Proceedings of the International Conference, Trento, Italy, June 15–24, 1994, 183–207. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Lozovanu, Victor. 2018.
“Singular Divisors and Syzygies of Polarized Abelian Threefolds.” ArXiv e-Prints, March.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08780.
Nakamaye, Michael. 2000.
“Stable Base Loci of Linear Series.” Mathematische Annalen 318 (4): 837–47.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002080000149.
———. 2005.
“Seshadri Constants at Very General Points.” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357 (8): 3285–97.
https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-04-03668-2.